(Blood) diamonds are not a girl's bestfriend
Thu, 05/08/2010 - 13:14 by HM writer

Naomi Campbell has complained that giving evidence in the trial of former Liberian dictator Charles Taylor - charged with murder, rape, mutilation and enslavement - is of a great inconvenience to her. She could be standing beneath a shower of Moet on a yacht in St Tropez with her billionaire boyfriend, for fuck's sake! Have these people no respect!

Campbell is currently giving evidence at the Hague war crimes tribunal concerning the alleged uncut diamonds she accepted by the former despot, and has since admitted to receiving 'dirty-looking' stones by two men in Liberia back in 1997. She added that she didn't think anything of receiving the gifts before admitting that she didn't know much about Liberia or its ruler Taylor.

She then complained:

"I don't want to be here. I was made to be here … This is an inconvenience to me."

Her evidence is crucial in proving that Taylor had owned rough or 'blood' diamonds despite his continual denial.

It's a shame she couldn't have just acted like her usual obnoxious self as she did here...

 

  • She's done exactly that. Stupidity won. And now it turns out she gave the dirty pebbles away before she left the continent, so she's home clear. But still a thicko donkey of the highest order.
    If she took the diamonds then gave them away why didn't she just say that? Why refuse to testify? Do you reckon she flirted all night with this Charlie boy because she just can't fucking help sucking up attention like a baby at the teat; then when a couple of shady buggers showed up at her room in the middle of the night with a big old bag of dirty stones, unchecked by security, she realised she may have made a big mistake and this guy could probably have her whole family killed? Do you think she actually gives a flying fuck about her family dying anyway??? (She certainly doesn't care about other people dying horribly, she's too busy having champers round Nelson Mandela's gaff)
    Answers to www.godshe'sacockhead.com.
    Anyway, Mia Farrow and the ex agent will be contradicting everything she said under oath, very soon. Roll on.

    Urfugginjokin Fri, 06/08/2010 - 10:31
  • Just a thought: this must be the one time she'll be praying her legendary stupidity comes to her defence. For if she's clever, she'll cite her lack of brains in accepting the "dirty pebbles". After all, it aint a crime to be daft.

    PuddyTwat Thu, 05/08/2010 - 21:16
  • Fucknuckle.

    Urfugginjokin Thu, 05/08/2010 - 20:42
  • input this URL:

    ( http://www.shoes2.us/ )

    you can find many cheap and fashion stuff
    (jor dan shoes)
    (NBA NFL NHL MLB jersey)
    ( lv handbag)
    (cha nel wallet)
    (D&G sunglasses)
    (ed har dy jacket)
    (UGG boot)

    WE ACCEPT PYAPAL or CREDIT CARD PAYMENT and FREE SHIPPING
    YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

    wwwshoes2us Thu, 05/08/2010 - 15:02
  • I think I would derive a disturbing amount of pleasure from putting the hurt on this disgusting minge-piece.

    The Rev Jesse Custer Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:57
  • There's something quite fascinating about the clash of 'serious news' and 'vacuous-celebrity news'.

    Ronnie Rarko Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:52
  • Will you listen to it? "Inconvenient" indeed. What a tool.
    She hasn't got a clue. And why should she? She wasn't raised to use her head. Putting one foot in front of the other, tossing a nylon syrup and pouting on a catwalk is about all she can manage. If she was still in Streatham she'd be in Primark stuffing tee-shirts up her top. What an embarassment.

    PuddyTwat Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:43
  • Anyone remotely surprised? Don't believe a word she said at the trial, she has the morals of a sociopathic snake, campaigns against fur one minute, wears fur on the catwalk the next, treat people around her like shite, take blood diamonds, blame being abandoned as a child for her behaviour, but wanted for nothing and had a private education as a child. Total cunt of the highest order.

    mrsmoon Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:09
  • Or just being the biggest cuntbag on the fucking planet?

    dandyboy Thu, 05/08/2010 - 13:57
  • Can she be charged with recieving a blood diamond ?

    grange Thu, 05/08/2010 - 13:48
  • Can she be charged with recieving a blood diamond ?

    grange Thu, 05/08/2010 - 13:48
  • Or just being the biggest cuntbag on the fucking planet?

    dandyboy Thu, 05/08/2010 - 13:57
  • Anyone remotely surprised? Don't believe a word she said at the trial, she has the morals of a sociopathic snake, campaigns against fur one minute, wears fur on the catwalk the next, treat people around her like shite, take blood diamonds, blame being abandoned as a child for her behaviour, but wanted for nothing and had a private education as a child. Total cunt of the highest order.

    mrsmoon Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:09
  • Will you listen to it? "Inconvenient" indeed. What a tool.
    She hasn't got a clue. And why should she? She wasn't raised to use her head. Putting one foot in front of the other, tossing a nylon syrup and pouting on a catwalk is about all she can manage. If she was still in Streatham she'd be in Primark stuffing tee-shirts up her top. What an embarassment.

    PuddyTwat Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:43
  • There's something quite fascinating about the clash of 'serious news' and 'vacuous-celebrity news'.

    Ronnie Rarko Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:52
  • I think I would derive a disturbing amount of pleasure from putting the hurt on this disgusting minge-piece.

    The Rev Jesse Custer Thu, 05/08/2010 - 14:57
  • input this URL:

    ( http://www.shoes2.us/ )

    you can find many cheap and fashion stuff
    (jor dan shoes)
    (NBA NFL NHL MLB jersey)
    ( lv handbag)
    (cha nel wallet)
    (D&G sunglasses)
    (ed har dy jacket)
    (UGG boot)

    WE ACCEPT PYAPAL or CREDIT CARD PAYMENT and FREE SHIPPING
    YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

    wwwshoes2us Thu, 05/08/2010 - 15:02
  • Fucknuckle.

    Urfugginjokin Thu, 05/08/2010 - 20:42
  • Just a thought: this must be the one time she'll be praying her legendary stupidity comes to her defence. For if she's clever, she'll cite her lack of brains in accepting the "dirty pebbles". After all, it aint a crime to be daft.

    PuddyTwat Thu, 05/08/2010 - 21:16
  • She's done exactly that. Stupidity won. And now it turns out she gave the dirty pebbles away before she left the continent, so she's home clear. But still a thicko donkey of the highest order.
    If she took the diamonds then gave them away why didn't she just say that? Why refuse to testify? Do you reckon she flirted all night with this Charlie boy because she just can't fucking help sucking up attention like a baby at the teat; then when a couple of shady buggers showed up at her room in the middle of the night with a big old bag of dirty stones, unchecked by security, she realised she may have made a big mistake and this guy could probably have her whole family killed? Do you think she actually gives a flying fuck about her family dying anyway??? (She certainly doesn't care about other people dying horribly, she's too busy having champers round Nelson Mandela's gaff)
    Answers to www.godshe'sacockhead.com.
    Anyway, Mia Farrow and the ex agent will be contradicting everything she said under oath, very soon. Roll on.

    Urfugginjokin Fri, 06/08/2010 - 10:31

Article Timeline