Paparazzi should be banned from the airport.Appearing in a bikini in a video and having some pervery shove a camera up your skirt are completely different.
Brand hasnt done anything wrong here.

Jiggers I've got the Association Of Photographers head office round the corner from my office and every few months they have a themed gallery display from their members where they all get into self congratulatory mode and fawn over how great they all are. I believe the latest theme was "upskirts & nipple-slips" so there you go, now it's art.

I wonder if members of the paparazzi generally and those who go for this kind of angle are really proud of their work?

Then I wonder if the newspapers and websites that buy their photos ever take a look at themselves too?

Finally, everyone who cannot get by without seeing what Katy Perry's snatch looks like - maybe with knickers, maybe (frotter frotter) without.

I'm guessing it's like Seth Armstrong in a SARS mask and I hope that image pops into your head the next time you're trying to crack one out.

Oh no ! more publicity for those shy retiring wallflowers Brand & Perry......how do they cope ? Let's start a campaign to get the worlds media to leave them alone, I mean it's obvious that what they really want is to live together in privacy and isolation so let's leave them to it.

Airports have ALWAYS been used as a pap opportunity (Most have their own official paps). We've pretty much stood by the intrusive pap thing. Ish.

I agree - the pap was a twat - I don't believe we've said anything of the contrary.

I think Harry's point was that whilst the pap is obviously out of order, Katy Perry has built a career off the back of a pair of tits and a latex dress and a song about sensationalist faux lesbianism. With this in mind, it's quite amusing when she acts shocked that anyone would try to photograph her lady flower.

That doesn't make what the pap did in anyway excusable and I think Russell did the gallant thing - but let's be honest - she's no shrinking violet in "sexualising her image" etc.

I can't even remember what the question was now.

Yerh! Wots it to you, sugartits??

I've got to admit, as far as celebrity couples go, these two are relatively unannoying. They're not on the front of OK shoving it in our faces, they're not trying to flog us his n' hers fragrances, they usually only pop up on telly when she's got a record out and he's got a film out, they seem to be genuinely quite fond of each other, they both have actual jobs- to be fair, they could be a lot worse.
ALSO...
Didn't HM promise a while back to stop getting random pap pics from celebs going to tescos or whatever and just say that when they're trying to be seen they're fair game??(i.e. red carpet/chinawhites/opening of an envelope)
So by the same logic, let's say Katy Perry and Russell Brand EXPECT to get papped at the airport. Wouldn't it be reasonable to say that her face is fair game but her fanny is not?
Getting out of a car with no knickers on is possibly a different ball game entirely, but going up an escalator and having a camera shoved up your skirt? I'd have bloody well done them for sexual assault.

Harry Bow you UTTER cunt.

Are you seriously insinuating that "she's asking for it" and that it's fair game for a pap to stick a zoom lens up a celebs dress as she's walking through an airport?