Perry-aid
Mon, 26/04/2010 - 12:33 by Aretha Franklin

Russell Brand and Katy Perry are on track to win Most Annoying Celebrity Couple for the second consecutive year as their wedding plans steam ahead....

But while the very sight of them is making us want to inject crack into our eyeballs, Katy Perry has instead turned to cigarettes, explaining:

“I’m stressed out with the wedding and I keep smoking to calm my nerves. I do it even though I know it is really bad for me and I know I need to stop.

Yes, it's really horribly stressful having almost a year and thousands of dollars to plan a party.

“I’m thinking I am going to have hypnotherapy to help me get over it. I’d never say to kids, ‘This is cool’. It’s a really bad habit that I need to quit.”

We can think of a few other things she should quit while she's at it.

 

Meanwhile, Russell might need some of that hypnotherapy to get him over his new fear of sex after he reportedly told The Sun:

"[Film sex is] actually sort of stressful. 


"You're standing with no pants, hunched over someone but without the lust."

Zzzzzzzzzzz.

 

 

  • The only difference between moral outrage and jealousy is a halo. :/

    angrykid Thu, 29/04/2010 - 10:11
  • Trouble is, Slug, this cunt is a fucking multimillionaire from being a bland undertalented mediocrity. Some fuckers are so gullible,...

    koshmar Thu, 29/04/2010 - 03:38
  • Oh dear, seems I have upset you and for that I am sorry. My implied point was that Russell Brand is, to my mind, not funny and not talented. You may argue, but compared to say, Bill Hicks or Robin Williams, he is simply dull. He is neither an actor of note, singer of great stature or a broadcaster of great insight. He has acheived very little apart from gaining a measure of notoriety from childish pranks and insulting people whilst wearing frankly ridiculous clothes and adopting a silly voice and mannerisms. In other words he is a symbol of the culture of obssessive celebrity whereby people exist for the sake of being in the papers. You quite rightly blame the media outlets for this, but there are two sides to this game. He and his management are quite happy to play along in order to increase his 'exposure' with the inevitable result that unless he becomes more and more outlandish he will simply fade from view. To my mind that's a sad reason for existence and worthy of derision.

    slug Wed, 28/04/2010 - 14:10
  • Christ, Blurgle, mate, you fucking go on a bit don't you? Hard man this and hard man that??

    I post on here cos I like calling people cunts.

    Guess what?

    You're a cunt too

    koshmar Tue, 27/04/2010 - 19:27
  • Personally, I saw this on Google updates. :/

    And if you ask me, critisism for no good reason is just as bad as sycophancy.

    Is there no such thing as reporting the facts anymore?
    And don't get me started on how idiotic celeb-gossip sites and magazines are anyway. How awful and innaccurate the reporting is, and how it's all just inane desperation for a story of any kind.

    Diluting the news with idiocy. ugh.

    xxminishaxx Tue, 27/04/2010 - 18:17
  • Christ, have we been linked to on heatworld or something? Where are all the talent vacuum-reverent freaks coming from?

    To people signing up for the sole purpose of burbling "I DON'T LIKE YOU YOU MADE FUN OF CELEBS I LIKE AND THAT MAKES YOU BAD THEM CELEBS REALLY UNDERSTAND ME INNIT", here's a quick tip: this is a celebrity gossip website that takes the piss out of celebrities. If you would like to read something a bit more sycophantic, kindly fuck off to DS or something.

    retrovertigo Tue, 27/04/2010 - 17:19
  • @louisasteph Fucking hell it is a blog that takes the piss out of celebrities and we come here to read the stories for that reason. If you want to read all of the nice stuff go of and read heat magazine you sad cunt!!

    spunkface Tue, 27/04/2010 - 11:41
  • Bum, tits, willy-pubes. You smell like a poo-bum.

    bellendercarlisle Tue, 27/04/2010 - 07:01
  • I'm having a "cultural dissonance" moment.

    The English are well-known for affecting sanctimonious rage in situations when anyone else would be faintly displeased, or perhaps mildly bored. They think it makes them cool, edgy, "hardcore", or whatever to be scathingly contemptuous and as crude and vicious as possible about things that really aren't that big of a deal.

    What they don't get is that to the rest of us, this "hard man" attitude makes them sound partly like the five-year-old who's just learned all the dirty words on the playground and partly like a hysterical psychotic over-emotional nut case who has no boundaries and no common sense. It can be frustrating, because if you try to explain that the fake "hard man" attitude is only hurting themselves *you* become the "over-emotional" one who's "blowing things out of proportion" or "taking things out of context". I suspect that's because the "hard man" attitude has become the norm to them, but I also think they desperately want to be seen as the victim of those eeeeeevil rich people and their dastardly use of the free enterprise system to enrich themselves.

    I mean go ahead, have a screaming shitting rage over some dumb interview with a couple of celebrities. Make yourself sound insanely jealous (and I'm sorry, you can say you're not jealous all you want, but please - the only reason you affect this idiotic brain-dead attitude is because you ARE jealous, so don't waste electrons denying it). Make yourself sound like a sociopath who thinks he has the right to kill people if they mildly offend him. But don't do it, then claim that you are the poor, poor, innocent victim of celebrities making you listen to them. There's an off button on your computer, same as on your TV and radio.

    blurgle Mon, 26/04/2010 - 22:33
  • What the hell is this "article" on about?
    People don't answer these questions for you to report as one-liners... followed by disdainful "commentary". They answer them becasue the damn journalists are always humping a celeb's leg for a quote.

    Paps and Celeb journalists are the real scum here.

    And I must say that a proper interview would be more interesting than anything you ever report.

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

    Whatever you define as annoying, they would say it's the begining of their ACTUAL marriage to each other.
    How lovely that it starts with people jealously scrutinising them.

    xxminishaxx Mon, 26/04/2010 - 21:18
  • Is someone having a Chris Crocker moment?

    angrykid Mon, 26/04/2010 - 20:29
  • louisasteph - maybe we just have more than a modicum of a grasp on reality over here at HM. None of us tend to be blinded by the mediocrity that is prevalent in the types of Perry (a VERY mediocre singer, even by today's poor standards) and Brand, a once-mildly funny "comedian" who thinks yelling "penis" and talking about poo are amusing, not to say about humiliating an elderly man in the name of "comedy". So, if THOUSANDS of people adulate that, more fool them.

    I don't get jealous about celebrities, love - I just think that the ones who don't deserve the adulation and riches (we're talking multi-millionaires here, remember) need to be reminded of who they are and where they've come from; and let's remember the nice sorts of people that we're on about - do you think a racist thug like Cheryl Cole deserves her glittering lifestyle?

    koshmar Mon, 26/04/2010 - 19:05
  • Koshmar: Maybe the readers of this particular blog are full of hatred for certain celebs, like the journalists who write on this blog and don't know the word love!So, I cannot name u those readers!But if search in Katy and Russell's fan forums you will find THOUSANDS of people who love them!

    Slug:I wish I was a personal friend of Russell and Katy, but I'm not!And FYI I prefer being a saddo obssessing fan, as u call it, than being miserable, mean and with hatred in soul like you!

    louisasteph Mon, 26/04/2010 - 17:35
  • Koshmar, you're forgetting that these are real people with feelings and shit. Lousiasteph is obviously upset with you because she is a close personal friend of Brand/Perry and knows them to be true and loyal friends. Isn't she? Oh....

    Either that or she's another saddo obssessing with a supposedly glamour-filled life that can never be hers by identifying with a pair of useless cunts who she thinks give her life some meaning.

    ps: icepicks? Yup, take a number and get to the back of the queue.

    slug Mon, 26/04/2010 - 15:18
  • And who are the readers on here who "love that couple"?

    Are you mad? We'd love to icepick the fucking pair of them

    koshmar Mon, 26/04/2010 - 15:04
  • And you are on track to win Most Annoying&Boring Blog!!
    Is that journalism to tell your personal opinion and not being OBJECTIVE??Never mind I don't think you have ever heard about the "journalists objectivity"!
    At least you must learn to respect some readers of your blog who love that couple!

    louisasteph Mon, 26/04/2010 - 14:50
  • And you are on track to win Most Annoying&Boring Blog!!
    Is that journalism to tell your personal opinion and not being OBJECTIVE??Never mind I don't think you have ever heard about the "journalists objectivity"!
    At least you must learn to respect some readers of your blog who love that couple!

    louisasteph Mon, 26/04/2010 - 14:50
  • And who are the readers on here who "love that couple"?

    Are you mad? We'd love to icepick the fucking pair of them

    koshmar Mon, 26/04/2010 - 15:04
  • Koshmar, you're forgetting that these are real people with feelings and shit. Lousiasteph is obviously upset with you because she is a close personal friend of Brand/Perry and knows them to be true and loyal friends. Isn't she? Oh....

    Either that or she's another saddo obssessing with a supposedly glamour-filled life that can never be hers by identifying with a pair of useless cunts who she thinks give her life some meaning.

    ps: icepicks? Yup, take a number and get to the back of the queue.

    slug Mon, 26/04/2010 - 15:18
  • Koshmar: Maybe the readers of this particular blog are full of hatred for certain celebs, like the journalists who write on this blog and don't know the word love!So, I cannot name u those readers!But if search in Katy and Russell's fan forums you will find THOUSANDS of people who love them!

    Slug:I wish I was a personal friend of Russell and Katy, but I'm not!And FYI I prefer being a saddo obssessing fan, as u call it, than being miserable, mean and with hatred in soul like you!

    louisasteph Mon, 26/04/2010 - 17:35
  • louisasteph - maybe we just have more than a modicum of a grasp on reality over here at HM. None of us tend to be blinded by the mediocrity that is prevalent in the types of Perry (a VERY mediocre singer, even by today's poor standards) and Brand, a once-mildly funny "comedian" who thinks yelling "penis" and talking about poo are amusing, not to say about humiliating an elderly man in the name of "comedy". So, if THOUSANDS of people adulate that, more fool them.

    I don't get jealous about celebrities, love - I just think that the ones who don't deserve the adulation and riches (we're talking multi-millionaires here, remember) need to be reminded of who they are and where they've come from; and let's remember the nice sorts of people that we're on about - do you think a racist thug like Cheryl Cole deserves her glittering lifestyle?

    koshmar Mon, 26/04/2010 - 19:05
  • Is someone having a Chris Crocker moment?

    angrykid Mon, 26/04/2010 - 20:29
  • What the hell is this "article" on about?
    People don't answer these questions for you to report as one-liners... followed by disdainful "commentary". They answer them becasue the damn journalists are always humping a celeb's leg for a quote.

    Paps and Celeb journalists are the real scum here.

    And I must say that a proper interview would be more interesting than anything you ever report.

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

    Whatever you define as annoying, they would say it's the begining of their ACTUAL marriage to each other.
    How lovely that it starts with people jealously scrutinising them.

    xxminishaxx Mon, 26/04/2010 - 21:18
  • I'm having a "cultural dissonance" moment.

    The English are well-known for affecting sanctimonious rage in situations when anyone else would be faintly displeased, or perhaps mildly bored. They think it makes them cool, edgy, "hardcore", or whatever to be scathingly contemptuous and as crude and vicious as possible about things that really aren't that big of a deal.

    What they don't get is that to the rest of us, this "hard man" attitude makes them sound partly like the five-year-old who's just learned all the dirty words on the playground and partly like a hysterical psychotic over-emotional nut case who has no boundaries and no common sense. It can be frustrating, because if you try to explain that the fake "hard man" attitude is only hurting themselves *you* become the "over-emotional" one who's "blowing things out of proportion" or "taking things out of context". I suspect that's because the "hard man" attitude has become the norm to them, but I also think they desperately want to be seen as the victim of those eeeeeevil rich people and their dastardly use of the free enterprise system to enrich themselves.

    I mean go ahead, have a screaming shitting rage over some dumb interview with a couple of celebrities. Make yourself sound insanely jealous (and I'm sorry, you can say you're not jealous all you want, but please - the only reason you affect this idiotic brain-dead attitude is because you ARE jealous, so don't waste electrons denying it). Make yourself sound like a sociopath who thinks he has the right to kill people if they mildly offend him. But don't do it, then claim that you are the poor, poor, innocent victim of celebrities making you listen to them. There's an off button on your computer, same as on your TV and radio.

    blurgle Mon, 26/04/2010 - 22:33
  • Bum, tits, willy-pubes. You smell like a poo-bum.

    bellendercarlisle Tue, 27/04/2010 - 07:01
  • @louisasteph Fucking hell it is a blog that takes the piss out of celebrities and we come here to read the stories for that reason. If you want to read all of the nice stuff go of and read heat magazine you sad cunt!!

    spunkface Tue, 27/04/2010 - 11:41
  • Christ, have we been linked to on heatworld or something? Where are all the talent vacuum-reverent freaks coming from?

    To people signing up for the sole purpose of burbling "I DON'T LIKE YOU YOU MADE FUN OF CELEBS I LIKE AND THAT MAKES YOU BAD THEM CELEBS REALLY UNDERSTAND ME INNIT", here's a quick tip: this is a celebrity gossip website that takes the piss out of celebrities. If you would like to read something a bit more sycophantic, kindly fuck off to DS or something.

    retrovertigo Tue, 27/04/2010 - 17:19
  • Personally, I saw this on Google updates. :/

    And if you ask me, critisism for no good reason is just as bad as sycophancy.

    Is there no such thing as reporting the facts anymore?
    And don't get me started on how idiotic celeb-gossip sites and magazines are anyway. How awful and innaccurate the reporting is, and how it's all just inane desperation for a story of any kind.

    Diluting the news with idiocy. ugh.

    xxminishaxx Tue, 27/04/2010 - 18:17
  • Christ, Blurgle, mate, you fucking go on a bit don't you? Hard man this and hard man that??

    I post on here cos I like calling people cunts.

    Guess what?

    You're a cunt too

    koshmar Tue, 27/04/2010 - 19:27
  • Oh dear, seems I have upset you and for that I am sorry. My implied point was that Russell Brand is, to my mind, not funny and not talented. You may argue, but compared to say, Bill Hicks or Robin Williams, he is simply dull. He is neither an actor of note, singer of great stature or a broadcaster of great insight. He has acheived very little apart from gaining a measure of notoriety from childish pranks and insulting people whilst wearing frankly ridiculous clothes and adopting a silly voice and mannerisms. In other words he is a symbol of the culture of obssessive celebrity whereby people exist for the sake of being in the papers. You quite rightly blame the media outlets for this, but there are two sides to this game. He and his management are quite happy to play along in order to increase his 'exposure' with the inevitable result that unless he becomes more and more outlandish he will simply fade from view. To my mind that's a sad reason for existence and worthy of derision.

    slug Wed, 28/04/2010 - 14:10
  • Trouble is, Slug, this cunt is a fucking multimillionaire from being a bland undertalented mediocrity. Some fuckers are so gullible,...

    koshmar Thu, 29/04/2010 - 03:38
  • The only difference between moral outrage and jealousy is a halo. :/

    angrykid Thu, 29/04/2010 - 10:11

Article Timeline