Kirsten Dunst topless in MelancholiaKirsten Dunst topless in Melancholia

Dunst corner
Wed, 05/10/2011 - 16:05 by Gemma Exley

We're sure you've all asked that age-old question 'how come Charlotte Gainsbourg starred in Lars von Trier's Antichrist instead of Kirsten Dunst' - it's basic dinner party fodder isn't it? Well, hold the debate - Dunst has revealed the answer; it was because she's famous with big tits whereas Gainsbourg is relatively unknown with a flat chest, that's just how the industry works... Except, hang on? Oh, we're confused... Whatever, Dunst would just like to remind everyone that she's famous with big boobs. Job done.

Talking to the Guardian, Dunst said:

"That kind of film (Antichrist) is harder for someone like me to get away with. I'm more in the public eye than Charlotte [Gainsbourg, the film's star].

"It's something about Charlotte's body, too. You couldn't have someone like me, with big breasts, in that film.

"Charlotte's thin and her breasts are small and that's easier to watch somehow. For someone like me to do that film - it would almost be ridiculously shocking."

Whereas with Gainsbourg it's not shocking because she ain't famous and her tits are small - yeah yeah, we get it, Dunst.

Article Timeline